↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Novel pathomechanisms in inflammatory neuropathies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel pathomechanisms in inflammatory neuropathies
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12974-017-1001-8
Pubmed ID
29179723
Authors

David Schafflick, Bernd C. Kieseier, Heinz Wiendl, Gerd Meyer zu Horste

Abstract

Inflammatory neuropathies are rare autoimmune-mediated disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system. Considerable progress has recently been made in understanding pathomechanisms of these disorders which will be essential for developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the future. Here, we summarize our current understanding of antigenic targets and the relevance of new immunological concepts for inflammatory neuropathies. In addition, we provide an overview of available animal models of acute and chronic variants and how new diagnostic tools such as magnetic resonance imaging and novel therapeutic candidates will benefit patients with inflammatory neuropathies in the future. This review thus illustrates the gap between pre-clinical and clinical findings and aims to outline future directions of development.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Other 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,750,904
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,126
of 2,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,156
of 436,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#15
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.