↓ Skip to main content

The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 43,386)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
Published in
British Medical Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7015
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Sumner, S. Vivian-Griffiths, J. Boivin, A. Williams, C. A. Venetis, A. Davies, J. Ogden, L. Whelan, B. Hughes, B. Dalton, F. Boy, C. D. Chambers

Abstract

To identify the source (press releases or news) of distortions, exaggerations, or changes to the main conclusions drawn from research that could potentially influence a reader's health related behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,820 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Sweden 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 199 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 30 14%
Other 24 11%
Other 68 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 25%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 13%
Unspecified 26 12%
Psychology 20 9%
Other 60 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1750. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#998
of 13,127,824 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#41
of 43,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 294,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#5
of 902 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,127,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 902 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.