↓ Skip to main content

All-organic optoelectronic sensor for pulse oximetry

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
13 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
568 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
All-organic optoelectronic sensor for pulse oximetry
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire M. Lochner, Yasser Khan, Adrien Pierre, Ana C. Arias

Abstract

Pulse oximetry is a ubiquitous non-invasive medical sensing method for measuring pulse rate and arterial blood oxygenation. Conventional pulse oximeters use expensive optoelectronic components that restrict sensing locations to finger tips or ear lobes due to their rigid form and area-scaling complexity. In this work, we report a pulse oximeter sensor based on organic materials, which are compatible with flexible substrates. Green (532 nm) and red (626 nm) organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) are used with an organic photodiode (OPD) sensitive at the aforementioned wavelengths. The sensor's active layers are deposited from solution-processed materials via spin-coating and printing techniques. The all-organic optoelectronic oximeter sensor is interfaced with conventional electronics at 1 kHz and the acquired pulse rate and oxygenation are calibrated and compared with a commercially available oximeter. The organic sensor accurately measures pulse rate and oxygenation with errors of 1% and 2%, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 517 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 23%
Student > Master 72 14%
Researcher 67 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 66 12%
Unknown 132 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 170 32%
Materials Science 65 12%
Physics and Astronomy 45 8%
Chemistry 31 6%
Chemical Engineering 12 2%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 165 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#178,090
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,516
of 49,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,065
of 365,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#20
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.