You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multiscale, Hierachical Model of Pulse Dynamics in Arid Land Ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091650 |
| Authors |
S.L. Collins, J. Belnap, N.B. Grimm, J.A. Rudgers, C.N. Dahm, P. D'Odorico, M. Litvak, D.O. Natvig, D.C. Peters, W.T. Pockman, R.L. Sinsabaugh, B.O. Wolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 27% |
| Researcher | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Professor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 88 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 60 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,614,362
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#356
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,812
of 368,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.