↓ Skip to main content

Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
761 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008324.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgina R Cox, Patch Callahan, Rachel Churchill, Vivien Hunot, Sally N Merry, Alexandra G Parker, Sarah E Hetrick

Abstract

Depressive disorders are common in children and adolescents and, if left untreated, are likely to recur in adulthood. Depression is highly debilitating, affecting psychosocial, family and academic functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 761 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 757 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 16%
Student > Bachelor 113 15%
Researcher 92 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 128 17%
Unknown 193 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 165 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 159 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 8%
Social Sciences 38 5%
Neuroscience 20 3%
Other 100 13%
Unknown 220 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,253,584
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,604
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,105
of 371,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.