↓ Skip to main content

The combined effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy on meropenem pharmacokinetics: a matched cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The combined effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy on meropenem pharmacokinetics: a matched cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0565-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran Shekar, John F Fraser, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Susan Welch, Steven C Wallis, Daniel V Mullany, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A Roberts

Abstract

The scope of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is expanding; however, optimal drug prescription during ECMO remains a developing science. Currently, there are no clear guidelines for antibiotic dosing during ECMO. This open-label, descriptive, matched-cohort pharmacokinetics (PK) study aimed to compare the PK of meropenem in ECMO patients to critically ill patients with sepsis not receiving ECMO (controls).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,456,900
of 13,243,473 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,114
of 4,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,101
of 294,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#178
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.