You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004508.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kittipat Charoenkwan, Elizabeth Matovinovic |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 23% |
| Unknown | 88 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,734,890
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,278
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,442
of 356,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#262
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.