↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004508.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kittipat Charoenkwan, Elizabeth Matovinovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 13 7%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 40 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#9,618,907
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,532
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,411
of 286,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#223
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.