↓ Skip to main content

Amino acid supplementation and impact on immune function in the context of exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amino acid supplementation and impact on immune function in the context of exercise
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-014-0061-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Fernandes Cruzat, Maurício Krause, Philip Newsholme

Abstract

Moderate and chronic bouts of exercise may lead to positive metabolic, molecular, and morphological adaptations, improving health. Although exercise training stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), their overall intracellular concentration may not reach damaging levels due to enhancement of antioxidant responses. However, inadequate exercise training (i.e., single bout of high-intensity or excessive exercise) may result in oxidative stress, muscle fatigue and muscle injury. Moreover, during the recovery period, impaired immunity has been reported, for example; excessive-inflammation and compensatory immunosuppression. Nutritional supplements, sometimes referred to as immuno-nutrients, may be required to reduce immunosuppression and excessive inflammation. Herein, we discuss the action and the possible targets of key immuno-nutrients such as L-glutamine, L-arginine, branched chain amino acids (BCAA) and whey protein.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 325 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 20%
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 70 21%
Unknown 66 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 66 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 7%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 79 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,031,771
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#250
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,337
of 431,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#238
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.