↓ Skip to main content

Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002027.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Warner, Jessal Chudasama, Charles G Kelly, Sean Loughran, Kenneth McKenzie, Richard Wight, Paola Dey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 18%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,281,120
of 13,332,857 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,018
of 10,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,886
of 295,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#169
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,332,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.