You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of dietary creatine supplementation on systemic microvascular density and reactivity in healthy young adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-115 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roger de Moraes, Diogo Van Bavel, Beatriz Serpa de Moraes, Eduardo Tibiriçá |
Abstract |
Dietary creatine supplementation (CrS) is a practice commonly adopted by physically active individuals. However, the effects of CrS on systemic microvascular reactivity and density have never been reported. Additionally, CrS is able to influence blood levels of homocysteine, resulting in presumed effects on vascular endothelial function. Thus, we investigated the effects of CrS on the systemic microcirculation and on homocysteine levels in healthy young individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 28% |
Spain | 2 | 11% |
Guatemala | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 23% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,071,094
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#499
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,159
of 365,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.