↓ Skip to main content

At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zheng, Joseph D. Ayotte

Abstract

This special issue contains 12 papers that report on new understanding of arsenic (As) hydrogeochemistry, performance of household well water treatment systems, and testing and treatment behaviors of well users in several states of the northeastern region of the United States and Nova Scotia, Canada. The responsibility to ensure water safety of private wells falls on well owners. In the U.S., 43 million Americans, mostly from rural areas, use private wells. In order to reduce As exposure in rural populations that rely on private wells for drinking water, risk assessment, which includes estimation of population at risk of exposure to As above the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level, is helpful but insufficient because it does not identify individual households at risk. Persistent optimistic bias among well owners against testing and barriers such as cost of treatment mean that a large percentage of the population will not act to reduce their exposure to harmful substances such as As. If households are in areas with known As occurrence, a potentially large percentage of well owners will remain unaware of their exposure. To ensure that everyone, including vulnerable populations such as low income families with children and pregnant women, is not exposed to arsenic in their drinking water, alternative action will be required and warrants further research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 27%
Engineering 8 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#510,837
of 11,838,893 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#286
of 7,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,076
of 257,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#7
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,838,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.