You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High prevalence of NMDA receptor IgA/IgM antibodies in different dementia types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acn3.120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Doss, Klaus-Peter Wandinger, Bradley T Hyman, Jessica A Panzer, Matthis Synofzik, Bradford Dickerson, Brit Mollenhauer, Clemens R Scherzer, Adrian J Ivinson, Carsten Finke, Ludger Schöls, Jennifer Müller vom Hagen, Claudia Trenkwalder, Holger Jahn, Markus Höltje, Bharat B Biswal, Lutz Harms, Klemens Ruprecht, Ralph Buchert, Günther U Höglinger, Wolfgang H Oertel, Marcus M Unger, Peter Körtvélyessy, Daniel Bittner, Josef Priller, Eike J Spruth, Friedemann Paul, Andreas Meisel, David R Lynch, Ulrich Dirnagl, Matthias Endres, Bianca Teegen, Christian Probst, Lars Komorowski, Winfried Stöcker, Josep Dalmau, Harald Prüss |
| Abstract |
To retrospectively determine the frequency of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) autoantibodies in patients with different forms of dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,878,856
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#320
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,743
of 272,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.