↓ Skip to main content

Book reviews.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Book reviews.
Published in
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, December 2014
DOI 10.2460/javma.245.12.1348
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,167,749
of 4,627,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
#1,008
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,994
of 150,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,627,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.