↓ Skip to main content

Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-4024-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Bertolaccini, Andrea Viti, Alberto Terzi

Abstract

Single-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), a technique progressively developed from the standard three-port approach in minimally invasive surgery, offers ergonomic advantages but also new challenges for the surgeon. We compared the ergonomics of three-port versus single-port VATS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 6%
Other 17 32%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 42%
Engineering 13 25%
Unspecified 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,734,890
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,371
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,962
of 331,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#82
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.