↓ Skip to main content

Ephedrine for myasthenia gravis, neonatal myasthenia and the congenital myasthenic syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ephedrine for myasthenia gravis, neonatal myasthenia and the congenital myasthenic syndromes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010028.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Vrinten, Angeli M van der Zwaag, Stephanie S Weinreich, Rob JPM Scholten, Jan JGM Verschuuren

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,031,087
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,389
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,379
of 254,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.