↓ Skip to main content

“Walking alongside:” collaborative practices in mental health and substance use care

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Walking alongside:” collaborative practices in mental health and substance use care
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-8-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ottar Ness, Marit Borg, Randi Semb, Bengt Karlsson

Abstract

Although the importance of collaboration is well established as a principle in research and in theory, what it actually means for practitioners to collaborate in practice, to be partners in a collaborative relationship, has thus far been given less attention. The aim of this study was to identify key characteristics of the ways in which mental health practitioners collaborate with service users and their families in practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 21%
Social Sciences 12 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,294,085
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#58
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,841
of 264,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.