↓ Skip to main content

Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
800 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.040
Authors

Caren S. Goldberg, Katherine M. Strickler, David S. Pilliod

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 800 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 765 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 161 20%
Student > Master 157 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 19%
Student > Bachelor 95 12%
Other 44 6%
Other 111 14%
Unknown 80 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 360 45%
Environmental Science 173 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 98 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 2%
Engineering 10 1%
Other 35 4%
Unknown 106 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,466,034
of 14,259,178 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,194
of 4,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,444
of 263,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,178 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.