↓ Skip to main content

Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Ashby, Greg Haug, Pete Mulcahy, Kathryn J Ogden, Oliver Jensen, Julia AE Walters

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 26 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,543,001
of 19,249,286 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,728
of 11,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,102
of 328,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,249,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.