↓ Skip to main content

Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Ashby, Greg Haug, Pete Mulcahy, Kathryn J Ogden, Oliver Jensen, Julia AE Walters

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Greece 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 80%
Researcher 8 53%
Student > Bachelor 7 47%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Postgraduate 6 40%
Other 16 107%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 267%
Unspecified 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Psychology 2 13%
Other 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,821,312
of 13,612,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,721
of 10,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,191
of 298,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,974 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.