↓ Skip to main content

Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
88 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
338 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02036-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Smith, Philip Schlaepfer, Katie Major, Mark Dyble, Abigail E. Page, James Thompson, Nikhil Chaudhary, Gul Deniz Salali, Ruth Mace, Leonora Astete, Marilyn Ngales, Lucio Vinicius, Andrea Bamberg Migliano

Abstract

Storytelling is a human universal. From gathering around the camp-fire telling tales of ancestors to watching the latest television box-set, humans are inveterate producers and consumers of stories. Despite its ubiquity, little attention has been given to understanding the function and evolution of storytelling. Here we explore the impact of storytelling on hunter-gatherer cooperative behaviour and the individual-level fitness benefits to being a skilled storyteller. Stories told by the Agta, a Filipino hunter-gatherer population, convey messages relevant to coordinating behaviour in a foraging ecology, such as cooperation, sex equality and egalitarianism. These themes are present in narratives from other foraging societies. We also show that the presence of good storytellers is associated with increased cooperation. In return, skilled storytellers are preferred social partners and have greater reproductive success, providing a pathway by which group-beneficial behaviours, such as storytelling, can evolve via individual-level selection. We conclude that one of the adaptive functions of storytelling among hunter gatherers may be to organise cooperation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 338 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 414 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 19%
Student > Master 53 13%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Other 21 5%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 96 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 55 13%
Psychology 49 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 11%
Arts and Humanities 26 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 4%
Other 101 24%
Unknown 121 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 997. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,542
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#326
of 58,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302
of 448,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#6
of 1,432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.