You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oak habitat recovery on California's largest islands: Scenarios for the role of corvid seed dispersal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13041 |
Authors |
Mario B. Pesendorfer, Christopher M. Baker, Martin Stringer, Eve McDonald‐Madden, Michael Bode, A. Kathryn McEachern, Scott A. Morrison, T. Scott Sillett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Austria | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 17 | 25% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,607,366
of 24,593,555 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,073
of 3,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,091
of 449,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#55
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.