You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D Printing of Living Responsive Materials and Devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201704821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinyue Liu, Hyunwoo Yuk, Shaoting Lin, German Alberto Parada, Tzu‐Chieh Tang, Eléonore Tham, Cesar de la Fuente‐Nunez, Timothy K. Lu, Xuanhe Zhao |
| Abstract |
3D printing has been intensively explored to fabricate customized structures of responsive materials including hydrogels, liquid-crystal elastomers, shape-memory polymers, and aqueous droplets. Herein, a new method and material system capable of 3D-printing hydrogel inks with programed bacterial cells as responsive components into large-scale (3 cm), high-resolution (30 μm) living materials, where the cells can communicate and process signals in a programmable manner, are reported. The design of 3D-printed living materials is guided by quantitative models that account for the responses of programed cells in printed microstructures of hydrogels. Novel living devices are further demonstrated, enabled by 3D printing of programed cells, including logic gates, spatiotemporally responsive patterning, and wearable devices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 71% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 542 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 23% |
| Researcher | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 15% |
| Unknown | 140 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 87 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 84 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 51 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 15% |
| Unknown | 159 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#59,679
of 24,796,678 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#12
of 16,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,326
of 450,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#2
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,678 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.