↓ Skip to main content

Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009543.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Min Zhao, Mao Lin He, Zeng Ming Xiao, Ting Song Li, Hao Wu, Hua Jiang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Other 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Engineering 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 23 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,594,459
of 15,377,318 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,315
of 11,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,182
of 304,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,377,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.