You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cancer, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrc3817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret A. Knowles, Carolyn D. Hurst |
| Abstract |
Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder comprises two long-recognized disease entities with distinct molecular features and clinical outcome. Low-grade non-muscle-invasive tumours recur frequently but rarely progress to muscle invasion, whereas muscle-invasive tumours are usually diagnosed de novo and frequently metastasize. Recent genome-wide expression and sequencing studies identify genes and pathways that are key drivers of urothelial cancer and reveal a more complex picture with multiple molecular subclasses that traverse conventional grade and stage groupings. This improved understanding of molecular features, disease pathogenesis and heterogeneity provides new opportunities for prognostic application, disease monitoring and personalized therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 760 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 135 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 13% |
| Researcher | 97 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 136 | 18% |
| Unknown | 163 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 161 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 9% |
| Unknown | 194 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#956,680
of 25,302,890 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#313
of 2,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,404
of 365,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,302,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.