You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten simple rules for international short-term research stays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005832 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego A. Forero, Sandra Lopez-Leon, George P. Patrinos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 10 | 27% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 13 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,357,314
of 26,126,599 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,098
of 9,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,523
of 451,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,126,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.