You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proximal iliotibial band syndrome: what is it and where is it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00256-011-1168-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Sher, Hilary Umans, Sherry A. Downie, Keith Tobin, Ritika Arora, Todd R. Olson |
| Abstract |
To describe the clinical and MR imaging features of a unique strain at the iliac tubercle enthesis. While this strain appeared to correspond to the iliotibial band (IT band) enthesis, the literature regarding the IT band origin was discrepant. As such, our second goal was to prove that the IT band originated at the iliac tubercle, through cadaveric dissection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 32% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,418,835
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#715
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,699
of 109,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.