↓ Skip to main content

Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Energy & Buildings, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology
Published in
Energy & Buildings, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.020
Authors

Paul Raftery, Marcus Keane, James O’Donnell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 380 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 32%
Student > Master 73 18%
Researcher 51 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 35 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 233 58%
Energy 35 9%
Environmental Science 16 4%
Design 14 3%
Computer Science 11 3%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 64 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,526,343
of 12,292,260 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Buildings
#255
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,833
of 345,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Buildings
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,292,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.