You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energy & Buildings, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.020 |
| Authors |
Paul Raftery, Marcus Keane, James O’Donnell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 436 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 17% |
| Researcher | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 244 | 54% |
| Energy | 41 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 4% |
| Design | 16 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Unknown | 96 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Buildings
#725
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,167
of 136,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Buildings
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.