↓ Skip to main content

Parasitic castration: the evolution and ecology of body snatchers

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parasitic castration: the evolution and ecology of body snatchers
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2009.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Lafferty, Armand M. Kuris

Abstract

Castration is a response to the tradeoff between consumption and longevity faced by parasites. Common parasitic castrators include larval trematodes in snails, and isopod and barnacle parasites of crustaceans. The infected host (with its many unique properties) is the extended phenotype of the parasitic castrator. Because an individual parasitic castrator can usurp all the reproductive energy from a host, and that energy is limited, intra- and interspecific competition among castrators is generally intense. These parasites can be abundant and can substantially depress host density. Host populations subject to high rates of parasitic castration appear to respond by maturing more rapidly.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 240 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 28%
Researcher 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 22 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 62%
Environmental Science 29 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 27 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,767,276
of 21,225,914 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#259
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,017
of 342,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,225,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.