↓ Skip to main content

Variation in Rising Limb of Colorado River Snowmelt Runoff Hydrograph Controlled by Dust Radiative Forcing in Snow

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 13,133)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
124 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in Rising Limb of Colorado River Snowmelt Runoff Hydrograph Controlled by Dust Radiative Forcing in Snow
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075826
Authors

Thomas H. Painter, S. McKenzie Skiles, Jeffrey S. Deems, W. Tyler Brandt, Jeff Dozier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Master 11 20%
Unspecified 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 36%
Environmental Science 11 20%
Unspecified 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 5 9%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,524
of 13,211,877 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#47
of 13,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#939
of 385,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#5
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,211,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.