↓ Skip to main content

Variation in Rising Limb of Colorado River Snowmelt Runoff Hydrograph Controlled by Dust Radiative Forcing in Snow

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
121 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in Rising Limb of Colorado River Snowmelt Runoff Hydrograph Controlled by Dust Radiative Forcing in Snow
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075826
Authors

Thomas H. Painter, S. McKenzie Skiles, Jeffrey S. Deems, W. Tyler Brandt, Jeff Dozier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 35%
Environmental Science 13 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,895
of 14,157,939 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#53
of 13,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#982
of 398,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#6
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,157,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.