↓ Skip to main content

Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003962.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Reid, Peggy M Cawthon, Jonathan C Craig, Joshua A Samuels, Donald A Molony, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease with approximately 30% to 40% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 20 years. The most common regimens include immunosuppressive agents, however the risks of long-term treatment often outweigh the potential benefits. Non-immunosuppressive options, including fish oils, anticoagulants, antihypertensive agents and tonsillectomy have also been examined but not reviewed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 142 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 28 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,141,218
of 15,521,499 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,439
of 11,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,447
of 304,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#202
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,521,499 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.