↓ Skip to main content

Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003962.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Reid, Peggy M Cawthon, Jonathan C Craig, Joshua A Samuels, Donald A Molony, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease with approximately 30% to 40% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 20 years. The most common regimens include immunosuppressive agents, however the risks of long-term treatment often outweigh the potential benefits. Non-immunosuppressive options, including fish oils, anticoagulants, antihypertensive agents and tonsillectomy have also been examined but not reviewed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Unspecified 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 32 33%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 60%
Unspecified 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 3 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,934,206
of 13,216,344 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,886
of 10,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,454
of 291,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.