↓ Skip to main content

Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008743.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Boyle, Leif Solberg, Michael Fiore

Abstract

Health information systems such as electronic health records (EHR), computerized decision support systems, and electronic prescribing are potentially valuable components to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical interventions for tobacco use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 194 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Psychology 11 6%
Computer Science 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,583,518
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,105
of 11,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,587
of 359,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.