↓ Skip to main content

Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008743.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Boyle, Leif Solberg, Michael Fiore

Abstract

Health information systems such as electronic health records (EHR), computerized decision support systems, and electronic prescribing are potentially valuable components to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical interventions for tobacco use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Psychology 10 6%
Computer Science 9 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,345,501
of 18,812,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,045
of 11,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,538
of 325,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.