↓ Skip to main content

Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008743.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Boyle, Leif Solberg, Michael Fiore

Abstract

Health information systems such as electronic health records (EHR), computerized decision support systems, and electronic prescribing are potentially valuable components to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical interventions for tobacco use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 7 7%
Computer Science 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,754,074
of 14,317,838 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,462
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,283
of 297,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,317,838 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.