The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 555 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The Serengeti strategy: How special interests try to intimidate scientists, and how best to fight back
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0096340214563674 |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 108 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 5% |
| Australia | 18 | 3% |
| Canada | 15 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 5 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Unknown | 337 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 457 | 82% |
| Scientists | 63 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 597. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#40,612
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#8
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#427
of 397,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#2
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.