You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
火山で発生する流れとその堆積物 : 火砕流・サージ・ラハール・岩なだれ
|
---|---|
Published in |
BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, October 1991
|
DOI | 10.18940/kazan.36.3_357 |
Authors |
早川 由紀夫 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 6 | 60% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,224,201
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#7
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#895
of 16,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them