↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008146.pub2
Pubmed ID
25519471
Authors

Claire M White, Pieter A van Doorn, Marcel PJ Garssen, Rachel C Stockley

Abstract

Persistent feelings of fatigue (or subjective fatigue), which may be experienced in the absence of physiological factors, affect many people with peripheral neuropathy. A variety of interventions for subjective fatigue are available, but little is known about their efficacy or the likelihood of any adverse effects for people with peripheral neuropathy.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 19%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Researcher 23 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 21%
Psychology 17 5%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 98 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,581,547
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,210
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,785
of 353,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.