↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire M White, Pieter A van Doorn, Marcel PJ Garssen, Rachel C Stockley

Abstract

Persistent feelings of fatigue (or subjective fatigue), which may be experienced in the absence of physiological factors, affect many people with peripheral neuropathy. A variety of interventions for subjective fatigue are available, but little is known about their efficacy or the likelihood of any adverse effects for people with peripheral neuropathy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 20%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 19%
Psychology 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 55 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,557,347
of 15,132,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,369
of 11,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,533
of 301,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,132,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.