RT @AhlvikLassi: Itse asiassa fossiilisia polttoaineita on jo niin paljon, että suurin osa pitää jättää käyttämättä! Arviot määristä vai…
RT @AhlvikLassi: Itse asiassa fossiilisia polttoaineita on jo niin paljon, että suurin osa pitää jättää käyttämättä! Arviot määristä vai…
Itse asiassa fossiilisia polttoaineita on jo niin paljon, että suurin osa pitää jättää käyttämättä! Arviot määristä vaihtelevat: · Hiilibudjetti n. 500 GtCO2 (1,5°C, 50%) · Fossiilisten polttoaineiden resurssipohja >3000 GtCO2 (spekulatiivinen luku)
RT @E_Santiago_Muin: Aquí en enlace al estudio de McGlade y Ekins en Nature sobre los fósiles que no deben ser explotados, uno de los más,…
RT @E_Santiago_Muin: Aquí en enlace al estudio de McGlade y Ekins en Nature sobre los fósiles que no deben ser explotados, uno de los más,…
RT @E_Santiago_Muin: Aquí en enlace al estudio de McGlade y Ekins en Nature sobre los fósiles que no deben ser explotados, uno de los más,…
RT @E_Santiago_Muin: Aquí en enlace al estudio de McGlade y Ekins en Nature sobre los fósiles que no deben ser explotados, uno de los más,…
Aquí en enlace al estudio de McGlade y Ekins en Nature sobre los fósiles que no deben ser explotados, uno de los más, citados al respecto: https://t.co/SvUpbPscDT
RT @LukeSMurphy: 5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
RT @LukeSMurphy: 5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
RT @dustin_benton: The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure…
RT @dustin_benton: The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure…
RT @dustin_benton: The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure…
RT @dustin_benton: The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure…
RT @dustin_benton: The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure…
RT @LukeSMurphy: 5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
RT @LukeSMurphy: 5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
RT @LukeSMurphy: 5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
5/ CCS won’t save us See this thread as to why… https://t.co/YtObO6Qzmn
The climate logic is bad: CCS no longer prevents fossil fuel stranded assets, because we can't build CCS infrastructure fast enough to cover existing extraction. We've known this since 2015 (see @TofMcGlade / Paul Ekins' https://t.co/bWSrJNqb5h and https:/
Biden @POTUS, the betrayer…just signed PUBLIC lands, OUR land, over to the Willow Project. This will unleash a carbon BOMB of unprecedented proportions. https://t.co/N89ET6t4Ns
@janlaarman @nuke_hero @VisualCap https://t.co/XczT2fvqQO "half of gas reserves and over 80 per cent of current coal reserves should remain unused from 2010 to 2050 in order to meet the target of 2 °C"
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
@jgkoomey this one was a landmark for me.. https://t.co/6WTO7YzhzP
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
#fossilfuels go OR life on Earth goes.
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
RT @ScientistsX: .@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territ…
.@TofMcGlade & Ekins 2015: "Our results show that policy makers’ instincts to exploit rapidly and completely their territorial fossil fuels are, in aggregate, inconsistent with their commitments to this temperature limit" 8/n https://t.co/kNQqUzw1Cl
Referencias: 1) BID: https://t.co/VClcLMIDb7 2) IEA Energy Outlook https://t.co/YBpsGpgVQ0 3) McGlade & Elkins (2015): https://t.co/fz7mA5bcmq 4) Hurtado (2018): https://t.co/ixAnyC7PVl 5) Litvinenko (2020): https://t.co/4pTtPQQEMT
4. The physical availability of fossil fuels is extensive. Proven reserves are sufficient to bust the 2C warming limit 3 times over. Potential reserves are a number of times that. Much https://t.co/h4r6oGNALq
@MatthieuGariel @davidperrotin @Mediapart Sur l'exploitation des gisements gaziers à l'heure du réchauffement climatique, au cas où @MatthieuGariel, Nature n'est pas une revue écolo mais une des revues de référence dans la recherche scientifique, au même t
RT @DoctorVive: More receipts here: https://t.co/alglTTvyht https://t.co/EJjgUhtiBp https://t.co/RmwqLx22wV 10/n
RT @DoctorVive: More receipts here: https://t.co/alglTTvyht https://t.co/EJjgUhtiBp https://t.co/RmwqLx22wV 10/n
More receipts here: https://t.co/alglTTvyht https://t.co/EJjgUhtiBp https://t.co/RmwqLx22wV 10/n
RT @jgkoomey: @kmac @bencaldecott McGlade, Christophe, and Paul Ekins. 2015. "The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when lim…
@ShaniAshkenazi אגב היה את המחקר הזה כבר ב-2015 בNature שטען באופן די דומה ש80% מפחם וגז יצטרכו להשאר באדמה https://t.co/2yKmCotzvX
RT @jgkoomey: @keithalexander Supporting evidence: McGlade, Christophe, and Paul Ekins. 2015. "The geographical distribution of fossil fuel…
@voss_59 @BleischwitzR @wolfersdorff @OECDaufDeutsch In der Debatte gab es auch den Hinweis auf diese Studie: https://t.co/HUfRCWDJWu
@40Potassium My impression is that the "peak oil" hypothesis has received less & less attention since it's been show that there's more than enough fossil fuel reserves to cause > 2C of warming https://t.co/mzlnm4UdY8
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
To avoid climate chaos we need to leave 1/3rd of oil and 1/2 of gas reserves in the ground. This applies to Scottish fossil fuels too. Disappointing that the Scottish Greens are still the only party to recognise this basic scientific fact. https://t.co/xC
RT @greenpeaceQC: L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au g…
RT @greenpeaceQC: L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au g…
RT @greenpeaceQC: L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au g…
RT @greenpeaceQC: L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au g…
RT @greenpeaceQC: L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au g…
L'écoute sélective de la #ScienceduClimat 🙄 SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION le #Budget2021 tant attendu est à nos portes : dites au gouvernement fédéral d'écouter les climatologues et d'en finir avec le #pétrole et le #gaz >> https://t.co/Ryh1DjFEmu Source: htt
@theresphysics The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C https://t.co/0guEizXgAw
The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C | Nature https://t.co/uHl3nSSt36
RT @FuentespereiraC: Si es que queremos alcanzar el objetivo de no aumentar la temperatura + de 2°C, según McGlade & Ekins (2015) debemos m…
RT @FuentespereiraC: Si es que queremos alcanzar el objetivo de no aumentar la temperatura + de 2°C, según McGlade & Ekins (2015) debemos m…
RT @FuentespereiraC: Si es que queremos alcanzar el objetivo de no aumentar la temperatura + de 2°C, según McGlade & Ekins (2015) debemos m…
Si es que queremos alcanzar el objetivo de no aumentar la temperatura + de 2°C, según McGlade & Ekins (2015) debemos mantener sin utilizar al menos un 80% de las reservas mundiales de carbón https://t.co/kH7Bipv6xr #chaocarbon #NoTronaduras #IslaRies
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil…
If peer-reviewed is what you need, there are 2 Nature papers –McGlade & Ekins “The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C” (but this is not the more stringent Paris target of ‘well below’ 2 °C) https://
@Bankfieldbecky @crisortunity Have used this before in a couple of things. Seems like a 'classic'? McGlade, C., Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517, 187–190 (2015) https://t.co/ns
@cfhinor @bdavidxyz @MacLesggy Non car ce n'est pas son travail. Il dit comment diminuer les effets sur le climat. Et si on décide de ne pas utiliser nos réserve car c'est nécessaire pour ne pas trop changer le climat cela risque de mener à une baisse d'a
They do this despite abundant research (e.g. from @TofMcGlade from @UCL_ISR in @nature) that continuing this behaviour is incompatible with our commitments under the climate change act and the Paris agreement. (>2° = bad) https://t.co/UaIr7UN0NJ
@MichealLehane @KevinSharpe59 @rtenews 80% of known reserves must remain in ground Where is logic in wasting time, money and resources adding to the amount of known reserves? That carbon has to remain sequestered anyway https://t.co/yypvN4xilO
RT @takvera: Dear @DanielAndrewsMP we have known since 2015 we need to restrict new fossil fuels (McGlade and Ekins https://t.co/0H9Kzvggsd…
RT @takvera: Dear @DanielAndrewsMP we have known since 2015 we need to restrict new fossil fuels (McGlade and Ekins https://t.co/0H9Kzvggsd…
Dear @DanielAndrewsMP we have known since 2015 we need to restrict new fossil fuels (McGlade and Ekins https://t.co/0H9Kzvggsd ) yet you want to lift Victorian moratorium, open up onshore gas adding to climate GHG emissions. Gas is not a transition fuel #n
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
Merci pour cet excellent papier publié dans Nature avec cette figure ! 😳😱 Les seules réserves actuelles de charbon permettrait de dépasser le budget carbone de 2°C en 2100. https://t.co/llQ5r6LOEG
@OlivierRaguenes vous ne citez pas ce papier dans votre travail, une raison ? https://t.co/OFdSei4lm4
RT @ericvidalenc: Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossil…
Le mérite de l'effondrement des prix du pétrole, cela pourrait être de faire comprendre que l'on a trop d'énergies fossiles (de pétrole, de gaz et de charbon) pour ne pas mettre en l'air le climat. Et pas que la pénurie géologique va résoudre le problème.
@fgui_ @BzhClair @AlainOscarNeo @JMJancovici Un peu quand même. Sinon l etat des connaissances scientifiques c est cela : trop de fossiles. On est d accord ? https://t.co/OFdSei4lm4
@lisamurkowski I guess these scientific conclusions might 'bother' @lisamurkowski : "We show that the development of resources in the Arctic and any increase in unconventional oil production are incommensurate with efforts to limit average global warming t
@chaluny @yoavr @FarkashOrit אבל המדע היה סגור על זה כבר ב2015, פשוט אנשים עדיין לא היו מוכנים לשמוע. מאמר מ Nature מינואר אותה שנה כבר אומר שבכל תסריט שבו נמנעים מעלייה בטמפ׳ עולמית ממוצעת של 2 מעלות, 80% ממאגרי הנפט, הפחם והגז *הידועים כבר* צריכים לא להש