↓ Skip to main content

Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R‐package carcass — a tutorial

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R‐package carcass — a tutorial
Published in
Wildlife Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.2981/wlb.00094
Authors

Fränzi Korner‐Nievergelt, Oliver Behr, Robert Brinkmann, Matthew A. Etterson, Manuela M. P. Huso, Dan Dalthorp, Pius Korner‐Nievergelt, Tobias Roth, Ivo Niermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 22%
Other 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 47%
Environmental Science 35 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 41 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Biology
#192
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,281
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Biology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.