↓ Skip to main content

Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R‐package carcass — a tutorial

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 145)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortality estimation from carcass searches using the R‐package carcass — a tutorial
Published in
Wildlife Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.2981/wlb.00094
Authors

Fränzi Korner‐Nievergelt, Oliver Behr, Robert Brinkmann, Matthew A. Etterson, Manuela M. P. Huso, Dan Dalthorp, Pius Korner‐Nievergelt, Tobias Roth, Ivo Niermann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 24%
Other 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 50%
Environmental Science 35 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,228,737
of 20,375,326 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Biology
#38
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,377
of 336,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,375,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.