↓ Skip to main content

School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
461 tweeters
facebook
18 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
625 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61213-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danuta Wasserman, Christina W Hoven, Camilla Wasserman, Melanie Wall, Ruth Eisenberg, Gergö Hadlaczky, Ian Kelleher, Marco Sarchiapone, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Julio Bobes, Romuald Brunner, Paul Corcoran, Doina Cosman, Francis Guillemin, Christian Haring, Miriam Iosue, Michael Kaess, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Helen Keeley, George J Musa, Bogdan Nemes, Vita Postuvan, Pilar Saiz, Stella Reiter-Theil, Airi Varnik, Peeter Varnik, Vladimir Carli

Abstract

Suicidal behaviours in adolescents are a major public health problem and evidence-based prevention programmes are greatly needed. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of school-based preventive interventions of suicidal behaviours.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 461 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 614 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 108 17%
Researcher 90 14%
Student > Bachelor 78 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 7%
Other 125 20%
Unknown 110 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 182 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 121 19%
Social Sciences 67 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 53 8%
Unknown 137 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 468. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#35,964
of 19,542,586 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#774
of 37,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#437
of 329,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#7
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,542,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.