↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of hospital infections by intervention and training (PROHIBIT): results of a pan-European cluster-randomized multicentre study to reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream…

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of hospital infections by intervention and training (PROHIBIT): results of a pan-European cluster-randomized multicentre study to reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-5007-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjallie van der Kooi, Hugo Sax, Didier Pittet, Jaap van Dissel, Birgit van Benthem, Bernhard Walder, Vanessa Cartier, Lauren Clack, Sabine de Greeff, Martin Wolkewitz, Stefanie Hieke, Hendriek Boshuizen, Jan van de Kassteele, Annemie Van den Abeele, Teck Wee Boo, Magda Diab-Elschahawi, Uga Dumpis, Camelia Ghita, Susan FitzGerald, Tatjana Lejko, Kris Leleu, Mercedes Palomar Martinez, Olga Paniara, Márta Patyi, Paweł Schab, Annibale Raglio, Emese Szilágyi, Mirosław Ziętkiewicz, Albert W. Wu, Hajo Grundmann, Walter Zingg, On behalf of the PROHIBIT consortium

Abstract

To test the effectiveness of a central venous catheter (CVC) insertion strategy and a hand hygiene (HH) improvement strategy to prevent central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in European intensive care units (ICUs), measuring both process and outcome indicators. Adult ICUs from 14 hospitals in 11 European countries participated in this stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled multicentre intervention study. After a 6 month baseline, three hospitals were randomised to one of three interventions every quarter: (1) CVC insertion strategy (CVCi); (2) HH promotion strategy (HHi); and (3) both interventions combined (COMBi). Primary outcome was prospective CRBSI incidence density. Secondary outcomes were a CVC insertion score and HH compliance. Overall 25,348 patients with 35,831 CVCs were included. CRBSI incidence density decreased from 2.4/1000 CVC-days at baseline to 0.9/1000 (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for patient and CVC characteristics all three interventions significantly reduced CRBSI incidence density. When additionally adjusted for the baseline decreasing trend, the HHi and COMBi arms were still effective. CVC insertion scores and HH compliance increased significantly with all three interventions. This study demonstrates that multimodal prevention strategies aiming at improving CVC insertion practice and HH reduce CRBSI in diverse European ICUs. Compliance explained CRBSI reduction and future quality improvement studies should encourage measuring process indicators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Psychology 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 70 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,087,532
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,015
of 5,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,129
of 446,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#32
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.