↓ Skip to main content

Monosodium glutamate neonatal treatment induces cardiovascular autonomic function changes in rodents

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monosodium glutamate neonatal treatment induces cardiovascular autonomic function changes in rodents
Published in
Clinics, January 2012
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Signorá Peres Konrad, Vera Farah, Bruno Rodrigues, Rogério Brandão Wichi, Ubiratan Fabres Machado, Heno Ferreira Lopes, Beatriz D'Agord Schaan, Kátia De Angelis, Maria Cláudia Irigoyen

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular autonomic function in a rodent obesity model induced by monosodium glutamate injections during the first seven days of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 9 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,258,834
of 21,353,728 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#690
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,704
of 343,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,353,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.