↓ Skip to main content

Climate change, phenology, and butterfly host plant utilization

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Climate change, phenology, and butterfly host plant utilization
Published in
Ambio, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0602-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose A. Navarro-Cano, Bengt Karlsson, Diana Posledovich, Tenna Toftegaard, Christer Wiklund, Johan Ehrlén, Karl Gotthard

Abstract

Knowledge of how species interactions are influenced by climate warming is paramount to understand current biodiversity changes. We review phenological changes of Swedish butterflies during the latest decades and explore potential climate effects on butterfly-host plant interactions using the Orange tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines and its host plants as a model system. This butterfly has advanced its appearance dates substantially, and its mean flight date shows a positive correlation with latitude. We show that there is a large latitudinal variation in host use and that butterfly populations select plant individuals based on their flowering phenology. We conclude that A. cardamines is a phenological specialist but a host species generalist. This implies that thermal plasticity for spring development influences host utilization of the butterfly through effects on the phenological matching with its host plants. However, the host utilization strategy of A. cardamines appears to render it resilient to relatively large variation in climate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 44%
Environmental Science 26 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,855,999
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#512
of 1,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,195
of 354,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.