↓ Skip to main content

Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005397.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle N McDonnell, Susan L Hillier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 379 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 21%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Unspecified 45 12%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 36 9%
Other 132 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 17%
Unspecified 63 16%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Other 64 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#992,177
of 12,819,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,188
of 10,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,666
of 290,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.