↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory Testing for Lyme Neuroborreliosis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Laboratory Testing for Lyme Neuroborreliosis
Published in
JAMA Neurology, January 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald Lautner, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor 1 33%
Librarian 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 33%
Environmental Science 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,103,232
of 12,391,395 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#1,268
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,987
of 274,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#50
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,391,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.