↓ Skip to main content

Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010534.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Cathy Bennett, Nick Midgley, Soili K Larkin, Yinghui Wei

Abstract

Parent-infant psychotherapy (PIP) is a dyadic intervention that works with parent and infant together, with the aim of improving the parent-infant relationship and promoting infant attachment and optimal infant development. PIP aims to achieve this by targeting the mother's view of her infant, which may be affected by her own experiences, and linking them to her current relationship to her child, in order to improve the parent-infant relationship directly.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 383 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 24%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 13%
Unspecified 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 10%
Other 108 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 131 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 89 23%
Unspecified 58 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Social Sciences 37 10%
Other 30 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#647,446
of 13,515,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,067
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,016
of 296,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,515,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.