You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resident duty hours around the globe: where are we now?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-s1-s8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Temple |
| Abstract |
Safe and appropriate health care, especially in urgent or emergency situations, is the expectation of the public throughout the developed world. Achieving this goal requires appropriate levels of medical and other staff, appropriate training, and sensible working hours. Too often the brunt of such care, especially in out-of-hours situations, is borne by medical residents, who - to make matters worse - are frequently poorly supervised by more senior and experienced staff. Many jurisdictions have been alerted to this problem and are striving to correct it. However, the variation in attempts to restrict the actual hours worked by residents to "safe" levels is enormous, and all too often there is no consensus as to what should be put in place to achieve safe patient care. This paper sets out the current position for Europe, North America, and Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 40% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Chad | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 53% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#393,782
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#19
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,474
of 370,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.