↓ Skip to main content

Overlap Between the General Factor of Personality and Trait Emotional Intelligence: A Genetic Correlation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overlap Between the General Factor of Personality and Trait Emotional Intelligence: A Genetic Correlation Study
Published in
Behavior Genetics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10519-017-9885-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitri van der Linden, Julie A. Schermer, Eveline de Zeeuw, Curtis S. Dunkel, Keri A. Pekaar, Arnold B. Bakker, Philip A. Vernon, K. V. Petrides

Abstract

A previous meta-analysis (Van der Linden et al., Psychol Bull 143:36-52, 2017) showed that the General Factor of Personality (GFP) overlaps with ability as well as trait emotional intelligence (EI). The correlation between trait EI and the GFP was so high (ρ = 0.88) in that meta-analysis that these two may be considered virtually identical constructs. The present study builds on these findings by examining whether the strong phenotypic correlation between the GFP and trait EI has a genetic component. In a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic twins, the heritability estimates for the GFP and trait EI were 53 and 45%, respectively. Moreover, there was a strong genetic correlation of r = .90 between the GFP and trait EI. Additional analyses suggested that a substantial proportion of the genetic correlations reflects non-additive genetic effects (e.g., dominance and epistasis). These findings are discussed in light of evolutionary accounts of the GFP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 37 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,240,173
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#55
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,661
of 450,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.