You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature25138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karl-Heinz Erb, Thomas Kastner, Christoph Plutzar, Anna Liza S. Bais, Nuno Carvalhais, Tamara Fetzel, Simone Gingrich, Helmut Haberl, Christian Lauk, Maria Niedertscheider, Julia Pongratz, Martin Thurner, Sebastiaan Luyssaert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 611 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 6% |
| Sweden | 27 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 26 | 4% |
| Finland | 20 | 3% |
| Germany | 20 | 3% |
| Canada | 17 | 3% |
| Norway | 16 | 3% |
| Australia | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 92 | 15% |
| Unknown | 268 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 448 | 73% |
| Scientists | 140 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 975 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 975 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 198 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 159 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 106 | 11% |
| Other | 54 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 5% |
| Other | 181 | 19% |
| Unknown | 226 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 289 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 160 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 94 | 10% |
| Engineering | 22 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 105 | 11% |
| Unknown | 284 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 868. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,955
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,056
of 98,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#400
of 450,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#33
of 822 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 822 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.