You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-lived efficient delayed fluorescence organic light-emitting diodes using n-type hosts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-017-02419-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lin-Song Cui, Shi-Bin Ruan, Fatima Bencheikh, Ryo Nagata, Lei Zhang, Ko Inada, Hajime Nakanotani, Liang-Sheng Liao, Chihaya Adachi |
| Abstract |
Organic light-emitting diodes have become a mainstream display technology because of their desirable features. Third-generation electroluminescent devices that emit light through a mechanism called thermally activated delayed fluorescence are currently garnering much attention. However, unsatisfactory device stability is still an unresolved issue in this field. Here we demonstrate that electron-transporting n-type hosts, which typically include an acceptor moiety in their chemical structure, have the intrinsic ability to balance the charge fluxes and broaden the recombination zone in delayed fluorescence organic electroluminescent devices, while at the same time preventing the formation of high-energy excitons. The n-type hosts lengthen the lifetimes of green and blue delayed fluorescence devices by > 30 and 1000 times, respectively. Our results indicate that n-type hosts are suitable to realize stable delayed fluorescence organic electroluminescent devices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 32% |
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 41 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 26 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,154,718
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,964
of 47,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,473
of 440,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#798
of 1,377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.