↓ Skip to main content

Lung function in severe pediatric asthma: a longitudinal study in children and adolescents in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung function in severe pediatric asthma: a longitudinal study in children and adolescents in Brazil
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13601-017-0183-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mônica Versiani Nunes Pinheiro de Queiroz, Cristina Gonçalves Alvim, Álvaro A. Cruz, Laura Maria de Lima Belizário Facury Lasmar

Abstract

In severe asthma, high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are used in order to achieve clinical and functional control. This study aimed to evaluate lung function in outpatients (children and adolescents) with severe asthma in Brazil, all of whom were treated with high doses of ICS. We evaluated all spirometry tests together and by ICS dose: 800 and > 800 µg/day. This was a 3-year longitudinal study in which we analyzed 384 spirometry tests in 65 severe asthma patients (6-18 years of age), divided into two groups by the dose of ICS (budesonide or equivalent): 800 and > 800 µg/day. At baseline, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio were both < 80% of the predicted values in 50.8% of the patients. The median age of the patients was 10.4 years (interquartile range 7.8-13.6 years). In the sample as a whole, there were significant increases in FEV1% and in the FEV1/FVC% ratio (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) over the course of the study. In the > 800 µg/day group, there were no statistical increases or decreases in FEV1, the FEV1/FVC ratio, or forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of the FVC (FEF25-75%), when calculated as percentages of the predicted values. However, the z-score for FEF25-75% showed a statistically significant reduction, in the sample as a whole and in the > 800 µg/day group. Also in the > 800 µg/day group, there was a significant reduction in the post-bronchodilator FEV1% (p = 0.004). The fact that the spirometric parameters (as percentages of the predicted values) remained constant in the > 800 µg/day group, whereas there was a gain in lung function in the sample as a whole, suggests an early plateau phase in the > 800 µg/day group. However, there was some loss of lung function in the > 800 µg/day group, as evidenced by a decrease in the z-score for FEF25-75%, suggesting irreversible small airway impairment, and by a reduction in the post-bronchodilator FEV1%, suggesting reduced reversibility of airway obstruction. Among children and adolescents with severe asthma, the use of ICS doses higher than those recommended for age does not appear to improve lung function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Design 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,579,736
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#610
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,614
of 439,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.