↓ Skip to main content

Strain profiling and epidemiology of bacterial species from metagenomic sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
90 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strain profiling and epidemiology of bacterial species from metagenomic sequencing
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02209-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Albanese, Claudio Donati

Abstract

Microbial communities are often composed by complex mixtures of multiple strains of the same species, characterized by a wide genomic and phenotypic variability. Computational methods able to identify, quantify and classify the different strains present in a sample are essential to fully exploit the potential of metagenomic sequencing in microbial ecology, with applications that range from the epidemiology of infectious diseases to the characterization of the dynamics of microbial colonization. Here we present a computational approach that uses the available genomic data to reconstruct complex strain profiles from metagenomic sequencing, quantifying the abundances of the different strains and cataloging them according to the population structure of the species. We validate the method on synthetic data sets and apply it to the characterization of the strain distribution of several important bacterial species in real samples, showing how its application provides novel insights on the structure and complexity of the microbiota.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Computer Science 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#673,854
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,626
of 55,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,487
of 453,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#329
of 1,376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.