↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Contribuições e desafios das práticas corporais e meditativas à promoção da saúde na rede pública de atenção primária do Município de São Paulo, Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribuições e desafios das práticas corporais e meditativas à promoção da saúde na rede pública de atenção primária do Município de São Paulo, Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00122016
Pubmed ID
29267686
Authors

Ana Tereza Costa Galvanese, Nelson Filice de Barros, Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of contributions and challenges associated with bodily practices and meditation for health promotion in the public primary care system. The qualitative study was developed in 16 healthcare units in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, using interviews with 29 health professionals and 36 practitioners of bodily practices and meditation, including participant observation of 31 practices such as Tai Chi, Lian Gong, Qigong, Yoga, Capoeira, Dance, Meditation, Relaxation, Mindfulness, and Body Awareness. There was an improvement in joint pain, mobility, balance, memory, depression, and anxiety, besides greater ease in coping with chronic conditions. Such contributions are related to favoring practitioners' autonomy, building health references through self-awareness; the combination of health promotion and therapeutic care in the approaches; and support for access to cultural goods and community spaces. The challenges identified here were precarious integration with the supply of other health services, lack of supervision and evaluation, and the predominance of a health-sector culture.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 27%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 28 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,923,510
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#354
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,175
of 439,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.