↓ Skip to main content

Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 549)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13638-017-0993-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Liang, Xiao Sun, Yunlei Sun, Yuan Gao

Abstract

Selection of text feature item is a basic and important matter for text mining and information retrieval. Traditional methods of feature extraction require handcrafted features. To hand-design, an effective feature is a lengthy process, but aiming at new applications, deep learning enables to acquire new effective feature representation from training data. As a new feature extraction method, deep learning has made achievements in text mining. The major difference between deep learning and conventional methods is that deep learning automatically learns features from big data, instead of adopting handcrafted features, which mainly depends on priori knowledge of designers and is highly impossible to take the advantage of big data. Deep learning can automatically learn feature representation from big data, including millions of parameters. This thesis outlines the common methods used in text feature extraction first, and then expands frequently used deep learning methods in text feature extraction and its applications, and forecasts the application of deep learning in feature extraction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 596 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 8%
Researcher 31 5%
Lecturer 30 5%
Other 72 12%
Unknown 236 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 213 36%
Engineering 45 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 52 9%
Unknown 254 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,275,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#7
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,300
of 444,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.